Arm Community
Site
Search
User
Site
Search
User
Groups
Arm Research
DesignStart
Education Hub
Graphics and Gaming
High Performance Computing
Innovation
Multimedia
Open Source Software and Platforms
Physical
Processors
Security
System
Software Tools
TrustZone for Armv8-M
中文社区
Blog
Artificial Intelligence
Automotive
Healthcare
HPC
Infrastructure
Innovation
Internet of Things
Machine Learning
Mobile
Smart Homes
Wearables
Forums
All developer forums
IP Product forums
Tool & Software forums
Pelion IoT Platform
Activity
Support
Open a support case
Documentation
Downloads
Training
Arm Approved program
Arm Design Reviews
More
Cancel
Developer Community
IP Products
System
Jump...
Cancel
System
SoC Design forum
questions about APB advantages
Blogs
Forums
Videos & Files
Help
Jump...
Cancel
New
State
Not Answered
Replies
2 replies
Subscribers
71 subscribers
Views
2186 views
Users
0 members are here
APB
AMBA
Bus Architecture
Related
questions about APB advantages
Offline
jiunyan jiunyan
over 6 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 8th November 2008 at
http://forums.arm.com
Hi! dear all
Some APB advantages are listed in AMBA 2.0 spec. They are
"¢ performance is improved at high-frequency operation
"¢ performance is independent of the mark-space ratio of the clock
"¢ static timing analysis is simplified by the use of a single clock edge
"¢ no special considerations are required for automatic test insertion
"¢ many Application-Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC) libraries have a better
selection of rising edge registers
"¢ easy integration with cycle based simulators.
I do not understand these advantages very well.
Especially about
no special considerations are required for automatic test insertion
. What dose this description mean? Can anyone tell me if you know? Thanks very much.
Parents
0
Offline
Colin Campbell
over 6 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 10th November 2008 at
http://forums.arm.com
Hello Jiunyan,
I think all of these points you list are simply down to the fact that the APB only ever uses the rising edges of the PCLK signal.
With regard to the specific point about ATPG you need to clock all the logic being tested using a single clock, so with all logic clocked naturally on the rising edge of the clock, you don't need special test gates to bring in a second "test" clock.
JD
Cancel
Up
0
Down
Reply
Accept answer
Cancel
Reply
0
Offline
Colin Campbell
over 6 years ago
Note: This was originally posted on 10th November 2008 at
http://forums.arm.com
Hello Jiunyan,
I think all of these points you list are simply down to the fact that the APB only ever uses the rising edges of the PCLK signal.
With regard to the specific point about ATPG you need to clock all the logic being tested using a single clock, so with all logic clocked naturally on the rising edge of the clock, you don't need special test gates to bring in a second "test" clock.
JD
Cancel
Up
0
Down
Reply
Accept answer
Cancel
Children
No data
More questions in this forum
By title
By date
By reply count
By view count
By most asked
By votes
By quality
Descending
Ascending
All recent questions
Unread questions
Questions you've participated in
Questions you've asked
Unanswered questions
Answered questions
Questions with suggested answers
Questions with no replies
Answered
strobe
0
6254
views
3
replies
Latest
27 days ago
by
Christopher Tory
Answered
AXI4-Relationships between the channels
0
1629
views
1
reply
Latest
1 month ago
by
Colin Campbell
Answered
How to assert PSLVERR in APB4 ?
0
1773
views
2
replies
Latest
1 month ago
by
PhanTam
Answered
How AHB Arbiter should handle granting bus masters while performing only a SINGLE transfer?
0
1688
views
1
reply
Latest
1 month ago
by
Colin Campbell
Answered
Should the SPLIT and RETRY response be given only for NONSEQ transfer?
0
2148
views
4
replies
Latest
1 month ago
by
ISHWAR GANIGER
<
>
View all questions in SoC Design forum