What is better?
by antutu and geekbeanch it is better snapdragon 820
isn't the following links enough?
for what is the big difference?
exynos it is weak?
Hi,another source of Exynos 8890's Geekbench score of the multi-core is 6,908.http://www.extremetech.com/computing/217949-samsungs-exynos-8-octa-8890-will-feature-the-companys-first-custom-cpu-core
It is better score than the snapdragon 820.The clock speeds of the snapdragon 820 and Exynos 8890 are respectively 2.2GHz and 2.3GHz.http://www.gizmochina.com/2015/11/17/kirin-950-vs-snapdragon-820-vs-exynos-8890-can-huawei-take-on-samsung-qualcomm/http://wccftech.com/samsungs-exynos-8890-specifications-claim-top-notch-frequency/
I think that there are not so big performance differences between the snapdragon 820 and Exynos 8890 (i.e. M1 Mongoose).
but still geekbeanch shows the advantage single core.
I'm sorry but I cannot catch your intention.
do you say M1 Mongoose should faster than Kryo?
I cannot understand why you are worried about "Exynos is weak".
because had to have a similar performance and snapdragon(kryo) is better
I'd like to know how you came the result of 'because had to have a similar performance'.
The information on each CPU implementation have not been disclosed and we cannot know the micro architectures of them.
My personal feeling of the fact would be reasonable because from the architecture licensees aspect the Samsung is an amateur (or the beginner) and Qualcomm is an veteran which have experiences of Scorpion and Krait.
http://browser.primatelabs.com /geekbench3/compare/5514271?ba seline=5389480
are there any significance with such the discussion?
snapdragon 820 is better. Plus it's cheaper.
antut, geekbeanch, and more (exynos):
Galaxy S7 Edge im Test: Design in Perfektion und neuer Android-Benchmark-König
Thanks for the link!